Updating and adapting the mission to new data

Understanding how The 1996 Communications Decency Act unintentionally set the stage for the growth and development of a digital platform industry that thrives off amplifying and disseminating harmful digital content, has made it clear we need to review the wisdom of “free harbour” Law.

Unfortunately amplifying and spreading hate, lies and deception, can be very profitable.

Law already exists to protect us from hate, lies and deception but their is a giant loop hole for business that provide access to others’ digital property.

The 1996 Communications Decency Act – it protects digital platforms from being sued for re-posting what would be deemed harmful content by a court of law. This loophole allows platforms to profit enormously at others expense. To close up that loophole but still preserve freedom of speech to a high degree. We need to close that loophole for business but leave it open for nonprofit public digital libraries that are prohibited from surveilling their users and exposing their users to third party advertising.

The reason for making this harsh distinction between the rights of a private enterprise and a public one is that the private platforms amplify and spread specific content for a fee thus creating the opportunity to buy the means to harm others and to profit at their expense. Public Libraries are neutral. They do not push content at users, they do not offer any opportunity to third parties to amplify and spread any specific message.

The mission of the moment 2022 is to focusing on speaking up about the need to close that loop hole as a prerequisite for building the new public service —

 

Mission 2018 was …

— to promote nonprofit digital communication services

— to peacefully disrupt the commercial communications services by encouraging people to abstain from using them

— to inform voters about the benefits of transitioning to nonprofit communications services

— to lobby governments to fund nonprofit communications services

Promoting the idea of creating through legislation a Digital Public Library: a Library where firms or individuals can upload their copyrighted content and where, if the content is free of advertising, the library will automatically pay the owners of the content a fee when their content is used by the public. This use-based payment system is democratic.

If, for any reason, the user deems the content to be inappropriate or unworthy, there will be a manual option for the user to claw back the automatically triggered payment to the Library. This manual claw back is intended to discourage those who may wish to profit from deception.